The master database and intelligence layer of the entire AGL Innovation Framework — the same role the AGL Failure Database plays for failures, RCA and reliability. Division 25 does not just store project information: it connects every innovation project, prototype, PoC, pilot, patent, research paper, product, asset, failure record, standard and engineering tool into one interconnected knowledge system, so that at any moment the framework can answer what is being innovated, why, how mature it is, what it cost, what it achieved and what should happen next.
The question this division answers — How do we turn every AGL innovation project into a single authoritative, interconnected record, so the framework becomes actionable innovation intelligence rather than a topic library?
Divisions 01–17 generate innovation opportunities and technology domains. Division 18 builds prototypes. Division 19 runs PoCs and pilots. Division 20 evaluates technology. Division 21 handles IP and commercialization. Division 22 covers research and collaboration. Division 23 tracks technology watch and future trends. Division 24 captures case studies and lessons learned. Division 25 captures, links, analyzes and governs all of it.
Every innovation project receives a unique, permanent Innovation Project ID that is never reused.
A short, technically meaningful title that immediately communicates the engineering purpose of the project.
AI-Based Automated Runway Fixture Defect Detection — not a vague title such as "AI Project."
Describes the engineering problem being solved.
Documents the current method before innovation, establishing the baseline against which innovation performance is later measured.
Describes the proposed technology or methodology.
Benefits should be measurable wherever possible, across five categories.
Low / Medium / High, or a numerical score.
Documents the complete development path from problem to deployment.
Every innovation record explicitly documents its limitations across eleven risk categories.
Technical · Safety · Operational · Financial · Reliability · Environmental · Cybersecurity · Supply-chain · Regulatory · User-acceptance · Commercial.
Known limitations · Unknowns · Dependencies · Assumptions.
Defines how the innovation will be proven in the field, linking directly to Division 19 — Proof-of-Concept & Pilot Projects.
Research · Engineering · Prototype · Testing · Pilot · Installation · Software · Hardware · Training · Maintenance cost — distinguishing CAPEX and OPEX where possible.
One of the most important fields — every innovation needs measurable success criteria.
Reliability — MTBF improvement · Maintenance — maintenance-hours reduction · Inspection — detection accuracy · Photometry — measurement accuracy · Energy — kWh reduction · Cost — lifecycle-cost reduction · Safety — personnel-exposure reduction.
Applicable standards — ICAO, FAA, DGCA, IEC, IS and other technical references — with standard, clause/section, applicability and compliance status.
Runway fixture · Taxiway fixture · CCR · Isolation transformer · Connector · Cable · PAPI · Sign · ALCMS · Photometry equipment.
Connects the project to the wider Innovation Framework and enables topic-based intelligence searches.
Predictive Maintenance · Computer Vision · Smart AGL · Automated Inspection.
Research papers · Technical reports · Manufacturer documentation · Test reports · Standards · Patents · Airport reports · Engineering studies · Internal technical documents.
Every innovation record maintains a controlled revision history and preserves historical changes rather than overwriting important project history.
| Revision | Date | Change | Prepared By | Reviewed By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 | — | Initial record | — | — |
| R1 | — | Technical update | — | — |
| R2 | — | Pilot results | — | — |
These fields transform the record from a simple project register into an Innovation Intelligence Database by classifying, scoring and cross-linking every project.
Classifies every project against a shared category list, with a Primary Category and optional Secondary Categories.
Smart AGL · AI · IoT · Digital Engineering · Robotics · Sustainability · Product Innovation · Engineering Innovation · Emerging Technology · Automation · Photometry · Predictive Maintenance · Safety & Reliability · Materials · Manufacturing · Control & Monitoring.
| TRL | General Stage |
|---|---|
| 1 | Basic principles |
| 2 | Technology concept |
| 3 | Experimental proof |
| 4 | Laboratory validation |
| 5 | Relevant-environment validation |
| 6 | Demonstration |
| 7 | Operational prototype |
| 8 | Qualified system |
| 9 | Proven operational system |
Both Current TRL and Target TRL.
Positive — improves safety · Neutral — no significant impact · Negative/Potential Risk — introduces concerns requiring mitigation.
Safety impact · Safety risk · Mitigation · Safety validation status.
Assesses the effect on airport/AGL operations.
Positive · Neutral · Negative · Unknown.
Downtime · Inspection time · Maintenance time · Availability · Operational disruption · Human intervention.
Energy impact · Carbon impact · Material impact · Waste impact · Equipment-life impact · Maintenance impact · Lifecycle impact.
High / Medium / Low / Neutral.
MTBF · MTTR · Availability · Failure frequency · Component life · System resilience.
Expected reliability improvement (e.g. +20%) and, later, Validated improvement (e.g. +14%) — the distinction between the two is important.
Energy savings · Labour savings · Maintenance savings · Downtime reduction · Asset-life extension · Reduced failures.
Estimated Payback Period and, after implementation, Actual Payback Period.
Shows where the project currently sits, from idea through to closure.
Idea · Screening · Feasibility · Research · Design · Prototype · Laboratory Test · PoC · Pilot · Validation · Product Development · Commercialization · Deployment · Operational · Closed · Abandoned.
Not Started · Planned · In Design · Fabrication · Testing · Passed · Failed · Modified · Completed.
Not Planned · Planned · In Preparation · Active · Completed · Passed · Failed · Repeated · Scaled · Closed.
Links directly to the PoC ID in Division 19.
Not Planned · Site Selection · Planned · Ready · Active · Completed · Validated · Failed · Scaled · Closed.
Not Applicable · Not Assessed · Under Assessment · Commercial Potential · Business Case · Product Development · Market Validation · Commercial Launch · Commercialized · Licensed · Technology Transfer · Abandoned.
Connects directly with Division 21.
Not Assessed · Idea Identified · Patent Screening · Patentability Assessment · Patent Concept · Filing Planned · Filed · Granted · Rejected · Licensed · Abandoned.
Connects directly with Division 22.
Internal · University · Research Institute · Airport · Manufacturer · Technology Company · Startup · Multi-Partner · Joint Venture.
Partner · Agreement status · Collaboration role · IP arrangement.
A powerful database connection — innovation can originate from an actual AGL failure. Links directly to the AGL Failure Database.
Links the innovation to the actual asset affected — runway edge light, taxiway centreline light, PAPI, CCR, isolation transformer, primary cable, connector, sign, ALCMS, approach-lighting system.
Asset ID · Asset Type · Location · System.
Links to the AGL Product Encyclopedia / Product Library, creating a direct connection between Innovation Intelligence and Product Intelligence.
Paper ID · Title · Authors · Institution · Publication · Date · Relevance · Key findings.
Links the innovation to engineering methodologies, allowing innovation knowledge to flow back into engineering practice.
Reliability-based design · Lifecycle design · Automated circuit design · Photometric modelling · Risk-based design · Optimization · Digital engineering.
Especially valuable for the engineering knowledge platform — links innovations to practical engineering tools.
Voltage-drop calculator · Cable-sizing calculator · Transformer-selection calculator · CCR-selection tool · Photometry analysis tool · Reliability calculator · Energy calculator · Lifecycle-cost calculator · ROI calculator · Risk calculator.
The real power of Division 25 comes from the relationships between records, not the records in isolation. A single Innovation Project connects outward to a Failure Record, an Asset Record and a Product Record, and forward through Research, Prototype and PoC into a Pilot, a Technology Evaluation, and finally a Patent, a Product or a Commercial outcome — all feeding back into Lessons Learned and Future Innovation.
A dashboard-level view classifying every active project on Innovation Value against Technology Maturity, to help decide where to invest.
Low TRL, low current value — early-stage ideas worth watching, not yet worth heavy investment.
Low TRL, high value — promising concepts that justify moving into prototype/PoC/pilot.
High TRL, low current value — mature but marginal; candidates for narrow or conditional adoption.
High TRL, high value — validated technologies ready for broader deployment and commercialization.
The database supports eight formal innovation gates, with every gate decision recorded in the project history.
Division 25 ultimately contains twenty linked databases/registers built on top of the field set above.
Six dashboard categories keep the innovation programme measurable at portfolio, technology, development, IP, commercial and impact level.
Each active project can also carry an Innovation Health Score (e.g. 82/100 — Healthy / Attention Required / At Risk / Critical) built from technical feasibility, TRL progression, schedule and cost performance, safety, reliability, PoC/pilot progress, and commercial and IP potential — plus lifecycle tracking of how long each project takes to move Idea → Feasibility → Prototype → PoC → Pilot → Commercialization, to surface bottlenecks in the Innovation Cycle Time.
Clear ownership keeps the master database trustworthy as it grows.
Division 25 is the data backbone connecting every preceding division into one intelligence platform.
Division 25 should not be treated as an Excel register alone. The long-term objective is to grow it into an AGL Innovation Intelligence Platform:
Every other division builds innovation. Division 25 remembers, connects and governs it.
That single source of truth is what lets the framework answer, at any time: what are we innovating, why, what technology is involved, how mature is it, where is it being tested, what did it achieve, what did it cost, what risks exist, who is collaborating, is there patent potential, which asset/product/failure does it relate to, what did we learn — and should we continue, stop, adopt, scale or commercialize it. That is what turns the 25-division Innovation Hub from a topic library into a genuine AGL Innovation Management & Intelligence System.
Quick answers about Innovation Database & Project Intelligence in the AGL Innovation Hub.
Division 25 is the master database and intelligence layer of the entire AGL Innovation Framework — the same role the AGL Failure Database plays for failures, RCA and reliability. It covers 17 topics (REC-01 to REC-17).
How do we turn every AGL innovation project into a single authoritative, interconnected record, so the framework becomes actionable innovation intelligence rather than a topic library?
Division 25 covers 38 fields in two groups. The 17 Standard Innovation Project Record fields are Project ID, Innovation Title, Problem Statement, Existing Solution, Proposed Innovation, Expected Benefits, Technical Feasibility, Implementation Roadmap, Risks & Limitations, Pilot Validation Plan, Estimated Cost, Success Metrics, Related Standards, Related Products, Related Topics, References and Revision History. The 21 Database Intelligence Fields are Innovation Category, Technology Maturity, Technology Readiness Level (TRL), Safety Impact, Operational Impact, Sustainability Impact, Reliability Impact, Estimated ROI, Development Stage, Prototype Status, PoC Status, Pilot Status, Commercialization Status, Patent Status, Collaboration Status, Related Failure Record, Related Asset, Related Product, Related Research Paper, Related Design Method and Related Calculator / Tool.
Divisions 01–17 generate innovation opportunities and technology domains. Division 18 builds prototypes. Division 19 runs PoCs and pilots. Division 20 evaluates technology. Division 21 handles IP and commercialization. Division 22 covers research and collaboration. Division 23 tracks technology watch and future trends. Division 24 captures case studies and lessons learned. Division 25 captures, links, analyzes and governs all of it.
The real power of Division 25 comes from the relationships between records, not the records in isolation. A single Innovation Project connects outward to a Failure Record, an Asset Record and a Product Record, and forward through Research, Prototype and PoC into a Pilot, a Technology Evaluation, and finally a Patent, a Product or a Commercial outcome — all feeding back into Lessons Learned and Future Innovation. STAGE 1 Origin Links; Failure Record · Asset Record · Product Record; STAGE 2 Innovation Project; The master record — problem, solution, feasibility, roadmap, risk; STAGE 3 Development; Research → Prototype → PoC → Pilot; STAGE 4 Technology Evaluation; TRL, validated performance, ROI, safety/operational/sustainability/reliability impact; STAGE 5 Outcome Links; Patent · Product · Commercial launch; STAGE 6 Lessons Learned → Future Innovation; Closes the loop back into Divisions 01–17.
A dashboard-level view classifying every active project on Innovation Value against Technology Maturity, to help decide where to invest. Explore; Low TRL, low current value — early-stage ideas worth watching, not yet worth heavy investment; Pilot; Low TRL, high value — promising concepts that justify moving into prototype/PoC/pilot; Adopt; High TRL, low current value — mature but marginal; candidates for narrow or conditional adoption; Scale; High TRL, high value — validated technologies ready for broader deployment and commercialization; Low TRL High TRL.
The database supports eight formal innovation gates, with every gate decision recorded in the project history. G0; Idea — is the problem worth investigating?; G1; Feasibility — is the concept technically feasible?; G2; Prototype — can a working solution be built?; G3; PoC — does it work in a controlled environment?; G4; Pilot — does it work operationally?; G5; Adoption — safe, reliable, economically justified?; G6; Commercialization — can it become a product?; G7; Scale — can it be deployed more broadly?.
Division 25 ultimately contains twenty linked databases/registers built on top of the field set above. It includes Innovation Project Master, Innovation Category Register, Technology Maturity Register, TRL Register, Innovation Risk Register, Prototype Register, PoC Register, Pilot Register, Innovation Cost Register, Innovation KPI Register, Patent Link Register, Collaboration Link Register, Failure Link Register, Asset Link Register, Product Link Register and Research Paper Link Register.
Six dashboard categories keep the innovation programme measurable at portfolio, technology, development, IP, commercial and impact level. Portfolio: Total innovation projects, Active / completed / abandoned, Projects by category, Projects by airport/project; Technology: Average TRL, Technologies at TRL 1–3, Technologies at TRL 4–6, Technologies at TRL 7–9, Ready for adoption; Development: Concepts, Research projects, Prototypes, PoCs, Pilots, Validated technologies; IP: Patent ideas, Patentability assessments, Patent filings, Granted patents, Licensed technologies; Impact: Energy savings, Reliability improvement, Maintenance reduction, Cost savings, Safety improvement; Each active project can also carry an Innovation Health Score (e.g. 82/100 — Healthy / Attention Required / At Risk / Critical) built from technical feasibility, TRL progression, schedule and cost performance, safety, reliability, PoC/pilot progress, and commercial and IP potential — plus lifecycle tracking of how long each project takes to move Idea → Feasibility → Prototype → PoC → Pilot → Commercialization, to surface bottlenecks in the Innovation Cycle Time.
Clear ownership keeps the master database trustworthy as it grows. It includes Innovation Database Owner — data quality, registration, classification, record integrity, relationships, reporting, Project Owner — technical updates, milestones, results, risks, lessons, Technical Reviewer — technical accuracy, feasibility, validation and Innovation Governance Committee — stage-gate decisions, priority, investment, continuation/termination.
Every innovation record maintains a controlled revision history and preserves historical changes rather than overwriting important project history.
Describes the engineering problem being solved. Should Answer: What is wrong?, Where does it occur?, How frequently?, What is the operational consequence?, What is the current limitation? and Why does the problem require innovation?.
Documents the current method before innovation, establishing the baseline against which innovation performance is later measured. Includes: Existing technology, Existing process, Existing equipment, Current performance, Current limitations, Current cost and Current maintenance requirement.
The innovation database and project intelligence start with understanding how records, evidence and cross-project data are captured, structured and reused. The next step is building the technical knowledge required to evaluate, develop and apply this intelligence across future AGL innovation work.
Develop structured knowledge across:
Understand how engineering problems become opportunities, technologies, concepts, validation activities and measurable improvements.
Understand today's AGL. Build tomorrow's capability.
Please read before relying on any content on this page or on any record downloaded from it.