AGL Component Library By Precision AGL Academy

AT‑VASIS

Abbreviated T‑Visual Approach Slope Indicator System – a 10-light, all-white glide slope system: a single-side wing bar plus a bisecting "fly-up"/"fly-down" line, reproducing the T-VASIS graduated indication with half the unit count and on one side of the runway only, normally set to the standard 3° glide path (adjustable up to around 4° where a steeper approach is specifically required), making it suitable for smaller airfields, heliports, and military forward operating bases where a full T‑VASIS is not justified.

AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-VASIS) one-sided wing bar and fly-line light layout

Image disclaimer: For identification and illustration only. It may show a product by another manufacturer and may not depict the exact item described; it is not a statement of any product’s quality, approval or performance. Third-party image and trademark rights belong to their owners. See full notice.

Overview

What Is It?

The Abbreviated T‑Visual Approach Slope Indicator System (AT‑VASIS) is a compact visual glide slope guidance system built from ten light units, all of which emit white light in normal operation — like full T‑VASIS, it does not rely on a red/white colour split. Where full T‑VASIS mirrors its wing bar and fly line on both sides of the runway (20 units total), AT‑VASIS installs a single wing bar of four lights plus one bisecting fly line of six lights on one side only, halving the unit count while keeping the same graduated, number-of-lights signal.

AT‑VASIS reads the same way as full T‑VASIS: the wing bar alone means on path, and progressively more fly-down or fly-up lights show how far above or below the aircraft is. Like T‑VASIS, it is normally set to the standard 3° glide path used by VASI and PAPI, and — like any VGSI — can be adjusted up to around 4° at airfields with obstacle clearance constraints or noise abatement requirements.

Purpose

Purpose & Function

AT-VASIS exists to make the graduated, T-shaped glide-path guidance of T-VASIS available to airfields that can't justify the cost or space of the full installation. By trimming the number of light units while keeping the distinctive T-shaped visual cue, it preserves the core benefit of the design — a precise, intuitive read on descent angle — at the standard 3° path, or steepened up to around 4° at sites facing obstacle clearance limits or noise abatement requirements.

Because pilots read the T-shape as a single visual pattern rather than tallying individual light colours, the abbreviated version still delivers a fast, unambiguous sense of high, low, or on-path even with fewer units, which is what makes it a workable lower-cost alternative rather than a compromised one.

Application

Where Is It Used?

AT‑VASIS is deployed on a variety of airfields where a steeper glide path and a compact system are required:

  • Military forward operating bases – where rapid deployment and compact footprint are essential.
  • Smaller commercial airfields – with obstacle clearance or noise abatement requirements.
  • Heliports – where a steeper approach angle is beneficial for helicopter operations.
  • Regional airstrips – with limited electrical infrastructure and space.
  • As a backup or supplement to ILS – on larger runways for additional visual guidance.
  • Airfields serving turboprop and regional jet aircraft – that benefit from steeper approach profiles.
Placement

Installation & Location

AT-VASIS uses a reduced light-bar arrangement mounted on one side of the runway, set back from the threshold at the distance needed to place the glide path over the threshold at the correct height, and tied into the runway centreline and threshold survey. Bars sit on frangible mounts at a fixed lateral offset from the runway edge, clear of the obstacle-limitation surface, with each bar individually levelled and aimed during commissioning to reproduce the standard T-VASIS visual cues from a smaller unit count. Cabling is run underground from each bar back to its constant current regulator, and the reduced footprint compared to full T-VASIS allows installation on narrower strips or sites with tighter clearance margins, while still requiring the same setting-out discipline against the runway survey.

Function

How Does It Work?

AT‑VASIS operates on a fundamentally different principle from PAPI and VASI, the same as full T‑VASIS: instead of a colour transition, it signals deviation through which and how many white lights are illuminated, with red reserved only as a severe-deviation warning — just with half the unit count of the full system. The system consists of:

  • Configuration: Ten light units on one side of the runway: a single "wing bar" of four lights running across the approach direction, and one bisecting longitudinal "fly line" of six lights running down the approach path. All units project white light in normal operation.
  • Colour Indication: The pilot reads the number of illuminated lights, not a colour split:
    • On the correct glide path: Only the wing bar is visible, steady white. No fly-up or fly-down lights are lit.
    • Above the glide path: The wing bar plus one, two, or three "fly-down" lights are visible — the more fly-down lights lit, the further above the slope.
    • Below the glide path: The wing bar plus one, two, or three "fly-up" lights are visible — the more fly-up lights lit, the further below the slope.
    • Well below the glide path: The wing bar and fly-up lights change from white to red as a distinct, higher-severity warning that the aircraft is significantly low.
  • Configurable Approach Angle: Like T‑VASIS, AT‑VASIS is normally set to the standard 3° glide path and can be set up to around 4° where obstacle clearance requires it.
  • Power and Control: AT‑VASIS units are powered from the constant current series circuit via isolating transformers, with intensity controlled by the CCR (typically 3‑step).
  • Integration: AT‑VASIS is typically deployed independently or integrated with the runway lighting system.
Architecture

System Architecture & Control Logic

AT‑VASIS carries the same fixed-optics control logic as full T‑VASIS, just with one wing bar and one fly line instead of two of each. The wing-bar units are aimed to appear steady white only near the correct glide-path angle. Each fly-line unit's lens/reflector is tilted at commissioning so it switches on at a specific elevation deviation from the design glide path, with the six units spaced along the line so that, together, they show progressively more fly-down lights above the design glide path and progressively more fly-up lights below it — the fly-up units also switch from white to red once the deviation passes a severe-low threshold, exactly as on the full system. That optical aim is fixed hardware, re-verified by ground or flight check — no processor decides which unit lights up. Both the wing bar and the fly line draw from the same constant current series circuit through their own isolating transformers, and the CCR (typically a basic 3‑step unit) sets one shared brightness level for the whole array. Loop-level fault monitoring is standard series-circuit practice: a voltage rise at constant current flags an open lamp or failed transformer as a loop fault, without pinpointing which unit is affected until sectionalised testing is done.

CCR (3‑step) → Series Circuit Loop → Isolating Transformer → Wing Bar (4 units) & Fly Line (6 units)

CCR (BASIC 3-STEP) Selects shared brightness step for the whole T SERIES CIRCUIT LOOP Same current to wing bar and fly line — brightness only ISOLATING TRANSFORMER (PER UNIT) Taps fixed loop current to each light unit WING BAR 4 units, steady white only near design glide path FLY-LINE UNITS 6 units, progressively switch on above/below the glide path SIGNAL IS OPTICAL, NOT ELECTRONIC The T-pattern comes from fixed aim on every unit, not from any command the circuit sends
Comparison

What "Abbreviated" Actually Means

AT‑VASIS keeps the full six-unit fly line and four-unit wing bar used on full T‑VASIS — the abbreviation comes from installing that wing-bar-plus-fly-line group on one side of the runway only (10 units total) instead of mirroring it on both sides (20 units). Same unit design, same optical principle, half the installation.

T‑VASIS — BOTH SIDES Left side Right side (mirrored) 20 units — wing bar (4) + fly line (6), both sides AT‑VASIS — ONE SIDE Left side only Right side omitted 10 units — same wing bar (4) + fly line (6)
White light unit — wing bar or fly line
Present in full T‑VASIS, omitted on AT‑VASIS
Construction

Physical Construction

Each unit is an individual box-section housing in die-cast aluminium alloy or louvred galvanised steel, built the same way as a full T-VASIS fixture and installed as the same wing-bar-plus-fly-line group, but on one side of the runway only rather than mirrored on both — the abbreviation for lower-traffic runways that don't warrant the complete, symmetric system. Optics are shaped as a lens/reflector assembly tuned to the fixture's role in the array, with a built-in levelling and pitch-adjustment mechanism used to aim each unit precisely to the set glide-path angle during commissioning. Every unit mounts on its own frangible mast at a fixed, surveyed height, engineered to shear away cleanly if struck, and is wired individually so the control system can switch fly-up or fly-down units independently as needed. Cabling runs underground in conduit to isolating transformers housed in nearby base cans, with sealed, direct-burial connectors and a drainage provision to keep the transformers and cable entries free of standing water.

Specification

Technical Parameters

ParameterTypical Value
Light SourceLED array or 45W/65W halogen lamp
ColourWhite (all units in normal operation); fly-up units switch to red only as a severe-below-path warning
Luminous IntensityUp to 12,000 cd (white) and 6,000 cd (red, fly-up severe-deviation state) depending on setting
Intensity Steps3‑step (day, twilight, night) or 5‑step (2.8A – 6.6A) CCR controlled
Glide Path AngleTypically 3° (same as PAPI/VASI); adjustable up to ~4° for site-specific obstacle/noise requirements
Beam PatternNarrow vertical beam per unit; signal is which/how many units are lit, not a per-unit colour transition
ConfigurationWing bar (4 units) + bisecting fly line (6 units), one side of the runway only
Number of Units10 units total (half of full T‑VASIS's 20, which mirrors the same group on both sides)
Mounting TypeElevated (frangible poles) – typically 10–20 m from runway edge
Isolating Transformer45W – 65W (6.6A series circuit) per unit
Protection ClassIP67 / IP68 (weather‑resistant)
Operating Temperature-40°C to +55°C
Power Supply

Electrical Requirements

RequirementTypical Value
Circuit TypeSeries circuit, constant current (CCR fed)
Rated Series Current6.6A (5-step: 2.8A / 3.4A / 4.1A / 5.2A / 6.6A) or 3-step equivalent
IsolationVia dedicated isolating transformer (45W/65W) per unit
Circuit ConfigurationWing-bar and fly-line units wired to hold a synchronised intensity step across the array
Transformer SecondaryMatched to fixture wattage; sized to series circuit rating
Cable TypeL-824 single-conductor, direct-burial rated, 5kV or 600V per circuit design
ConnectorL-823 primary connector, submersible-rated splice
Insulation Resistance≥ 50 MΩ (megger test, cable-to-ground)
Earthing/GroundingFixture body and base can bonded to airfield earth grid
Fault ProtectionCCR-level ground fault and open-circuit detection
Power SourceCCR output, regulated per ICAO/FAA intensity step schedule
Optical Performance

Photometric Requirements

ParameterTypical Value
Main Beam Intensity (White)≥ 9,000 cd on-axis per unit, up to 12,000 cd at full intensity
Main Beam Intensity (Red)≥ 4,500 cd on-axis per unit, up to 6,000 cd at full intensity
Switch-On Sharpness≤ 4 arc-minutes vertical transition band per fly-line unit (angle at which each unit switches on, not a colour transition)
Vertical Beam Spread6-unit fly line spaced about the design glide-path reference (typically 3°, adjustable up to ~4° where required); wing bar fixed at the on-slope reference angle
Horizontal Beam Spread± 5° to ± 10° either side of runway centreline plane
Isocandela DistributionPer ICAO Annex 14 Attachment A / relevant national civil aviation authority T-VASIS figures
Chromaticity (White)Within ICAO Annex 14 white boundary (CIE coordinates)
Chromaticity (Red)Within ICAO Annex 14 red boundary (CIE coordinates)
Intensity Tolerance± 25% of rated value at each CCR step (field measurement)
Maintenance Factor≥ 50% of new-fixture intensity before lamp/lens replacement is due
Test MethodMobile photometric van/goniophotometer or fixed test bench per unit
Compliance

Applicable Standards

ICAO Annex 14

Guidance for abbreviated visual slope indicators including AT‑VASIS

FAA AC 150/5340-25

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) Systems – closest FAA equivalent guidance; AT‑VASIS is primarily governed outside the US by ICAO Annex 14 and national CAAs

UK CAA CAP 168

Licensing of aerodromes – AT‑VASIS requirements

IEC/TS 61827

Characteristics of inset and elevated luminaires used on aerodromes and heliports (photometric & electrical performance)

Prerequisites

Installation Requirements

Reduced Array Setout
Civil

Tie the shortened bar arrangement to the runway centreline and threshold survey at the distance needed to place the glide path over the threshold at the correct height.

Frangible Pole Foundations
Civil

Install footings for each bar within the tighter clearance margins typical of the narrower strips AT-VASIS is used on.

Duct & Cable Route to CCR
Electrical

Run underground cabling from each bar back to its constant current regulator.

Isolating Transformer Matching
Electrical

Confirm each unit's 45W–65W isolating transformer matches the series circuit's rated current step before connection.

Unit-by-Unit Aiming & Levelling
Mechanical

Individually level and aim each bar during commissioning to reproduce the standard T-VASIS visual cues from the smaller unit count.

Frangible Coupling Fixing
Mechanical

Torque frangible pole couplings to the specified value across the reduced array.

Narrow-Strip Clearance Check
Documentation

Verify the reduced footprint fits within the available clearance margins at sites too tight for full T-VASIS.

Pre-Energisation Sign-off
Documentation

Record survey coordinates, cable routes, and torque values for every bar as-built before the site is closed.

Verification

Testing & Commissioning

Insulation Resistance (Megger) Test
Pre-Energisation

Megger-test each unit's isolating transformer and the series loop before energisation, confirming insulation resistance clears the acceptable minimum ahead of backfill.

Loop Continuity & Resistance Test
Pre-Energisation

Verify series loop continuity end to end across the wing-bar and fly-line units and record total loop resistance, ruling out open circuits or high-resistance splices before first energisation.

Primary/Secondary Voltage Verification
Energisation

With the CCR energised, confirm secondary voltage at each unit's connector matches the transformer's rated ratio at the commissioned current step.

Independent Switching Verification
Energisation

Confirm each fly-up and fly-down unit switches independently under control system command, since correct glide-path indication depends on individual units illuminating in the right combination even with the reduced unit count.

Glide Path Angle Verification
Final Acceptance

Set each unit's aiming angle with a calibrated aiming tool or theodolite to the design glide-path angle (typically 3°, or the site-specific angle up to ~4° where set steeper), confirming the wing bar and fly line together present the correct on-slope, fly-up, and fly-down pattern from the approach.

Photometric Commissioning Test
Final Acceptance

Measure beam intensity, colour, and transition sharpness on each unit with a calibrated photometer against ICAO/FAA commissioning tolerances.

Frangibility & Mounting Verification
Pre-Energisation

Confirm each unit's frangible mast shear point, base height, and surveyed position meet as-built tolerances before the site is finally backfilled.

Documentation & As-Built Sign-off
Final Acceptance

Record insulation, continuity, voltage, switching logic, and photometric readings for all units alongside as-built position and aiming angles in the commissioning dossier.

Upkeep

Inspection & Maintenance

Wing Bar & Fly-Line Alignment Check
Annual

Calibrate both the wing-bar and fly-line units with precision optical tools, since accurate alignment of both remains critical despite the single-side configuration.

Photometric Intensity Check
Annual

Verify white beam intensity across the wing bar and fly line, and red beam intensity on the fly-up severe-deviation state, against ICAO thresholds using a calibrated photometer.

Lens Cleaning
Quarterly

Clean dust, rubber deposits, and de-icing fluid residue from each unit's lens to maintain colour transition integrity.

Lamp / LED Module Inspection
Semi-annual

Check each unit's light source for failure; with fewer units than full T-VASIS a single failure is less severe but still worth prompt replacement.

Frangible Coupling Check
Annual

Inspect couplings for fatigue from wind loading and thermal cycling and replace on schedule to preserve breakaway performance.

Insulation Resistance Test
Annual

Megger-test each unit's isolating transformer and series circuit to confirm insulation resistance stays above the minimum, flagging moisture ingress before it causes a fault.

Cable & Connector Inspection
Annual

Examine primary and secondary cable connections for corrosion or loose crimps, a common source of intermittent series-circuit faults.

Mounting Pole Inspection
Annual

Check pole verticality and base condition for each unit in the wing bar and fly line to ensure the indication stays correctly positioned.

Field Notes

Common Field Issues

Alignment Calibration

AT‑VASIS requires precise calibration of both the wing-bar and fly-line units. Being on one side only doesn't reduce alignment complexity compared to full T‑VASIS — the same accuracy is still critical for correct glide path indication. Regular calibration using precision optical tools is essential.

Lens Contamination

Dust, rubber deposits, and de‑icing fluids can reduce light output and affect the colour transition. Routine cleaning and photometric testing are required to maintain the integrity of the indication.

Lamp or LED Module Failure

With fewer units than full T‑VASIS, the impact of a single failure is less severe, but regular inspections and prompt replacement are still necessary.

Frangible Coupling Fatigue

AT‑VASIS units are mounted on frangible poles. Wind loading and thermal cycling can weaken couplings. Regular inspection ensures breakaway performance on impact.

Pilot Familiarity

Like T‑VASIS, the T‑shaped indication is less familiar than PAPI or VASI. Airfields using AT‑VASIS should ensure pilots are aware of the system and its interpretation.

Diagnostics

Troubleshooting Guide

Wing-Bar or Fly-Line Unit Dark, Others Normal
Likely Cause
Failed LED module / lamp in that unit, or an open isolating transformer feeding it.
Diagnostic Steps
Confirm series loop continuity through the affected unit's transformer primary; megger the transformer; check secondary voltage at the connector with the CCR energised.
Corrective Action
Replace the failed lamp/LED module if the transformer checks healthy; otherwise swap the isolating transformer and re-seal the connectors before backfill.
Entire Series Circuit Dark / CCR Will Not Regulate
Likely Cause
Open-circuit fault in the series loop feeding the wing-bar and fly-line units (severed cable, corroded splice, or a failed transformer acting as an open point).
Diagnostic Steps
Check the CCR fault/open-circuit indication first; loop-resistance test from the CCR output to isolate the faulted segment; sectionalise and megger cable runs between the wing bar and fly line.
Corrective Action
Excavate and repair or replace the faulted cable section and connector; re-test insulation resistance before reinstating the circuit.
CCR Trips on Overcurrent or Ground Fault
Likely Cause
Moisture ingress at a unit, connector, or base can has degraded insulation resistance, creating a short or partial ground fault on the series loop.
Diagnostic Steps
Megger the full circuit to identify the low-resistance segment; visually inspect suspect units for cracked gaskets, condensation, or damaged secondary cable jackets.
Corrective Action
Dry out or replace the affected unit/connector, renew O-rings and gaskets, and confirm insulation resistance is back above the acceptable minimum before re-energising.
Incorrect or Ambiguous Indication
Likely Cause
The wing-bar or fly-line units have drifted from their commissioned elevation setting; with only one side installed, a single unit out of alignment has a larger effect on the readable indication than it would on the full, mirrored T-VASIS array.
Diagnostic Steps
Carry out a ground or flight inspection of the indication against design values; check each unit's levelling and pitch-adjustment setting on both the wing bar and fly line.
Corrective Action
Re-aim and re-level the affected unit(s) to the surveyed angle using precision optical tools, then re-verify the complete indication with a follow-up inspection.
Reduced or Hazy Light Output
Likely Cause
Contaminated or eroded lens, an aging LED array or halogen lamp, or the CCR running on a lower brightness step than required.
Diagnostic Steps
Run a photometric intensity check against ICAO/FAA thresholds; inspect and clean the lens; confirm the CCR is set to the correct intensity step for prevailing conditions.
Corrective Action
Clean or replace the lens, replace a degraded lamp/LED module, or correct the CCR step setting; re-verify with a follow-up photometric reading.
Unit Leaning, Loose, or Misaligned
Likely Cause
Frangible coupling has begun to fatigue or partially shear, or a base footing has settled due to ground movement.
Diagnostic Steps
Visually and physically check the frangible coupling for cracking or play; re-check unit aim against tolerance; inspect the surrounding ground for settlement or heave.
Corrective Action
Replace the frangible coupling on schedule if fatigued, re-level and re-aim the unit, and address any footing settlement to prevent recurrence.
Reliability

Failure Modes & Root Causes

LED Module / Lamp Failure
High Severity
Root Cause
Solder-joint fatigue from thermal cycling, moisture ingress through a compromised board seal, or ordinary end-of-life lumen depreciation.
Effect
A dark unit on either the wing bar or the fly line; with only one side installed, a single loss has a bigger effect on the readable indication than it would on a full, mirrored T-VASIS array.
Detection Method
Megger test of the transformer, secondary voltage check with the CCR energised, and visual confirmation that all wing-bar and fly-line units are alight.
Isolating Transformer Failure
High Severity
Root Cause
Moisture ingress leading to insulation breakdown, a manufacturing defect in the winding, or a blown primary fuse-wire link from a transient surge.
Effect
Open-circuit point in the series loop; darkens the affected unit or, if the open extends to the loop itself, can take down the whole wing-bar or fly-line circuit.
Detection Method
Megger test of the transformer, secondary voltage check with the CCR energised, and loop-resistance testing from the CCR output.
Wing-Bar or Fly-Line Unit Elevation Drift
High Severity
Root Cause
Gradual footing settlement, vibration-induced loosening of the pitch-adjustment mechanism, or an aiming error introduced during maintenance.
Effect
An incorrect or ambiguous indication, since the single-side array has no mirrored group on the other side to help a pilot cross-check the pattern the way full T-VASIS's symmetric layout can.
Detection Method
Ground or flight inspection of the complete indication against design values, and periodic check of each unit's levelling and pitch-adjustment setting.
Series Cable / Connector Insulation Breakdown
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Cable jacket damage, corroded splices, or prolonged standing water in the duct run between the wing-bar and fly-line units.
Effect
Ground fault or short circuit that trips the CCR, or an intermittent partial fault that degrades insulation resistance across the loop.
Detection Method
Full-circuit megger test to flag the low-resistance segment, followed by sectionalised testing to pinpoint the fault location.
Lens Contamination or Erosion
Low Severity
Root Cause
Prolonged UV exposure, abrasive particulate erosion, and grime or rubber-deposit build-up on the outer lens surface.
Effect
Reduced or hazy light output and a softened colour transition, making the indication harder to read at range.
Detection Method
Scheduled photometric intensity testing against ICAO/FAA thresholds and visual inspection of the lens during quarterly cleaning.
Frangible Coupling Fatigue
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Cyclic loading from mower or vehicle contact, material fatigue over the service interval, or corrosion at the coupling threads.
Effect
Unit leans, loosens, or separates from its base, taking that wing-bar or fly-line light out of aim tolerance or out of service.
Detection Method
Physical inspection for cracking or play in the coupling, and periodic fixture-aim/level checks against tolerance.
Precautions

Safety & Operational Notes

Series Circuit Isolation
Electrical Safety

The wing-bar and fly-line units run on a constant-current series circuit that can carry several kV across the loop. De-energise and lock out the CCR, then verify zero energy at the fixture before opening a base can or handling cable connectors.

Airside Work Coordination
Operational

Any work on or near an active runway requires ATC/airside coordination and a NOTAM while a unit is dark or out of tolerance; with only one side installed, a single out-of-service light has a larger effect on the readable indication than it would on a full T-VASIS array.

Frangibility Not to Be Defeated
Mechanical

Never substitute the frangible coupling with a rigid fitting or over-torque it during installation or repair; the coupling must still shear cleanly on aircraft impact to limit damage under the frangibility requirement.

Verify Full Indication Before Return to Service
Operational

After maintenance touching any wing-bar or fly-line unit, confirm the complete on-slope/fly-up/fly-down indication reads correctly from the approach; the single-side array leaves less margin to absorb a single unit's aiming error than a full T-VASIS installation.

FOD Control at the Base Can
Operational

Keep tools, fasteners, and removed gaskets accounted for at all times when the base can is open, and secure or remove any loose material before reinstating the fixture, to prevent foreign object debris on the movement area.

Insulation Test Before Re-Energisation
Electrical Safety

After any cable, connector, or transformer work, megger test the affected series loop before restoring power, since a residual fault at re-energisation can trip the CCR or damage other units on the same circuit.

PPE & Grounding
Personnel Safety

Use insulated tools and appropriate PPE when working on series-circuit connections, and confirm the fixture and base can are bonded/grounded per the electrical design before reconnecting the loop.

Restore to Compliant State
Compliance

Do not leave a wing-bar or fly-line unit out of aim tolerance, at reduced intensity, or otherwise non-compliant after maintenance; verify photometric and positional conformance on the full array before closing out the work and cancelling the associated NOTAM.

Field Insight

Engineering & Expert Notes

Fly-Down Redundancy Is Halved on the Single-Side Array
Design

The full T-VASIS relies on its mirrored fly lines on both sides to give advance warning of a gross below-path deviation; AT-VASIS's single fly line gives pilots less redundancy before a large deviation shows, so keep the wing-bar units within tighter tolerance to compensate.

Confirm the Aim Jig Is Set for the Site's Actual Angle
Alignment

Where a site has set AT-VASIS to a steeper angle (up to around 4°) instead of the standard 3° for obstacle or noise reasons, using an alignment tool left at its default 3° setting is a common site error; confirm the jig or theodolite is configured for the site-specific angle before any adjustment.

Angle Drift Has Compliance Weight, Not Just Photometric Weight
Compliance

Where the steeper angle exists specifically for obstacle clearance or noise abatement, any post-settling angle drift matters beyond the usual visual glide path tolerance; document angle verification against the original obstacle assessment, not just as a routine photometric pass/fail.

Single-Side Array Makes Each Unit More Visible
Maintenance

With only one side installed, losing a single light unit changes the perceived pattern more noticeably than the same loss would on a full, mirrored T-VASIS; prioritise fly-line unit faults over wing-bar faults when triaging a reported outage, since the fly-line lights carry the graduated deviation information.

Military-Pattern Sites May Run Non-Standard Power Infrastructure
Electrical

AT-VASIS deployed at military airfields sometimes runs on non-standard voltage or frequency infrastructure; verify transformer and CCR compatibility with the actual site supply rather than assuming civil AGL power standards apply.

Log Angle and Intensity as Two Separate Check Items
Verification

Because the reduced unit count is a defining feature of AT-VASIS, and the angle may have been steepened for a site-specific reason, angle verification and intensity verification should be tracked as distinct line items at each visit rather than folded into a single general pass/fail.

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

Short answers about the AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System): what it is, how it works, typical specifications, standards, maintenance and common faults.

Q1What is an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System)?

The Abbreviated T‑Visual Approach Slope Indicator System (AT‑VASIS) is a compact visual glide slope guidance system built from ten light units, all of which emit white light in normal operation — like full T‑VASIS, it does not rely on a red/white colour split.

Q2What is the purpose of an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System)?

AT-VASIS exists to make the graduated, T-shaped glide-path guidance of T-VASIS available to airfields that can't justify the cost or space of the full installation. By trimming the number of light units while keeping the distinctive T-shaped visual cue, it preserves the core benefit of the design — a precise, intuitive read on descent angle — at the standard 3° path, or steepened up to around 4° at sites facing obstacle clearance limits or noise abatement requirements.

Q3Where is an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System) used and installed?

AT‑VASIS is deployed on a variety of airfields where a steeper glide path and a compact system are required: Military forward operating bases – where rapid deployment and compact footprint are essential. Smaller commercial airfields – with obstacle clearance or noise abatement requirements. Heliports – where a steeper approach angle is beneficial for helicopter operations. Regional airstrips – with limited electrical infrastructure and space. As a backup or supplement to ILS – on larger runways for additional visual guidance. Airfields serving turboprop and regional jet aircraft – that benefit from steeper approach profiles.

Q4How does an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System) work?

AT‑VASIS operates on a fundamentally different principle from PAPI and VASI, the same as full T‑VASIS: instead of a colour transition, it signals deviation through which and how many white lights are illuminated , with red reserved only as a severe-deviation warning — just with half the unit count of the full system.

Q5What are the typical technical parameters of an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System)?

Typical values are — Light Source: LED array or 45W/65W halogen lamp; Colour: White (all units in normal operation); fly-up units switch to red only as a severe-below-path warning; Luminous Intensity: Up to 12,000 cd (white) and 6,000 cd (red, fly-up severe-deviation state) depending on setting; Intensity Steps: 3‑step (day, twilight, night) or 5‑step (2.8A – 6.6A) CCR controlled; Glide Path Angle: Typically 3° (same as PAPI/VASI); adjustable up to ~4° for site-specific obstacle/noise requirements; Beam Pattern: Narrow vertical beam per unit; signal is which/how many units are lit, not a per-unit colour transition.

Q6What are the electrical requirements for an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System)?

Typical requirements are — Circuit Type: Series circuit, constant current (CCR fed); Rated Series Current: 6.6A (5-step: 2.8A / 3.4A / 4.1A / 5.2A / 6.6A) or 3-step equivalent; Isolation: Via dedicated isolating transformer (45W/65W) per unit; Circuit Configuration: Wing-bar and fly-line units wired to hold a synchronised intensity step across the array; Transformer Secondary: Matched to fixture wattage; sized to series circuit rating; Cable Type: L-824 single-conductor, direct-burial rated, 5kV or 600V per circuit design; Connector: L-823 primary connector, submersible-rated splice; Insulation Resistance: ≥ 50 MΩ (megger test, cable-to-ground).

Q7What photometric requirements apply to an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System)?

Typical requirements are — Main Beam Intensity (White): ≥ 9,000 cd on-axis per unit, up to 12,000 cd at full intensity; Main Beam Intensity (Red): ≥ 4,500 cd on-axis per unit, up to 6,000 cd at full intensity; Switch-On Sharpness: ≤ 4 arc-minutes vertical transition band per fly-line unit (angle at which each unit switches on, not a colour transition); Vertical Beam Spread: 6-unit fly line spaced about the design glide-path reference (typically 3°, adjustable up to ~4° where required); wing bar fixed at the on-slope reference angle; Horizontal Beam Spread: ± 5° to ± 10° either side of runway centreline plane.

Q8Which standards apply to an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System)?

The main references are ICAO Annex 14 — Guidance for abbreviated visual slope indicators including AT‑VASIS; FAA AC 150/5340-25 — Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) Systems – closest FAA equivalent guidance; AT‑VASIS is primarily governed outside the US by ICAO Annex 14 and national CAAs; UK CAA CAP 168 — Licensing of aerodromes – AT‑VASIS requirements; IEC/TS 61827 — Characteristics of inset and elevated luminaires used on aerodromes and heliports (photometric & electrical performance). Always verify the current edition and your aerodrome's approved requirements.

Q9How often should an AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System) be inspected and maintained?

Typical maintenance tasks and intervals are: Wing Bar & Fly-Line Alignment Check (annual); Photometric Intensity Check (annual); Lens Cleaning (quarterly); Lamp / LED Module Inspection (semi-annual); Frangible Coupling Check (annual); Insulation Resistance Test (annual); Cable & Connector Inspection (annual); Mounting Pole Inspection (annual). Your airport's approved maintenance programme takes precedence.

Q10How do I troubleshoot common AT-VASIS (Abbreviated T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System) faults?

Common symptoms covered are: Wing-Bar or Fly-Line Unit Dark, Others Normal; Entire Series Circuit Dark / CCR Will Not Regulate; CCR Trips on Overcurrent or Ground Fault; Incorrect or Ambiguous Indication; Reduced or Hazy Light Output; Unit Leaning, Loose, or Misaligned. For example, for "Wing-Bar or Fly-Line Unit Dark, Others Normal": Likely Cause: Failed LED module / lamp in that unit, or an open isolating transformer feeding it. Diagnostic Steps: Confirm series loop continuity through the affected unit's transformer primary; megger the transformer; check secondary voltage at the connector with the CCR energised. Corrective Action: Replace the failed lamp/LED module if the transformer checks healthy; otherwise swap the isolating transformer and re-seal the connectors before backfill.

Explore Further

Related Components

Go Further

Go Beyond the Component. Understand the Complete AGL System.

You have explored the component. Now understand how it works within the complete Airfield Ground Lighting system.

Learn AGL from fundamentals to design, installation, testing, photometry, commissioning, maintenance and troubleshooting through structured technical training at Precision AGL Academy.

Build practical knowledge. Understand the circuit. Read the standards. Troubleshoot with confidence.

Your next step in AGL starts here.

The Learning Pathway
Learn Understand Design Test Maintain Document Apply Certify

Need expert guidance on AT‑VASIS selection, installation, or calibration?

Precision AGL Academy provides advice on glide path design, photometric performance, and field alignment of AT‑VASIS systems for military and civilian applications.